There were some important nuggets to be picked up from
Bank of Canada Governor’s address to the Saskatchewan Trade and Export
Partnership in the last week of April:
·
One of the most important forces powering Canada’s
economy currently is the long-term strength in global prices for resources; and, for Canada, oil stands out.
·
As
people earn more, they spend more and, as this work force grows, they need more
of everything - from Tim Hortons to pickup trucks. This leads to more jobs and
higher wages in other sectors and other regions of the economy, so everyone
benefits.
·
Diversifying
Canada’s export markets is important to future growth and resilience.
·
Canada’s
is an export-driven economy. Canadian economy needs to shift gears and for
exports to lead again.
A new report from the Conference Board around middle of
May put Canada's three oil rich provinces on top of the world in terms of
economic performance. The report places Alberta, Saskatchewan and Newfoundland
-- the three oil producing provinces -- in that order as the top performers
with A-plus scores across indicators such as per capita income, economic
growth, unemployment and productivity. They are the only jurisdictions
rated to have A-plus economies. Alberta is "class leader," says the
report with 2013 per capita income that was $10,000 higher than Norway, the
top-ranked country in that indicator. For the rest of the country the news was
not so stellar.
What the above narrative clearly
suggests is that while the 31 subsectors (of Bank of Canada) of the non-energy
export sector need to be promoted with suitable strategies, the increase in production and export of
the energy resources, i.e., oil and gas is vital from the point of view of
Canadian economy’s restoration to good health in near term and sustaining it in the long term.
However, the growth of the aforementioned two energy
resources appears to be getting bogged down in an endless loop of consultation,
opposition and procrastination. As Leo De
Bever, chief executive of Alberta Investment Management Corp., the largest
wealth fund in the country with assets under management of $63-billion, says,
“We find it easier to pay somebody not to build something rather than actually
build it. There has been a shortage of
resolve to build projects.”
De Bever was
alluding to opposition to various pipeline projects and oil sands projects. To
compound issues there is tardiness is formulating policies that the investors
need to know urgently to firm up their investment decisions. For example,
investors (Petronas, Shell, Chevron et al) are eagerly waiting on British Columbia’s final decision on the tax
regime. As well, the investors are concerned about wage inflation, the tax
environment and about Canada’s ability to actually deliver in a timely fashion
on environmental assessments.
Besides cost-competitiveness
of doing business in Canada (e.g. British Columbia) being crucial, time is of
the essence as investor companies are mulling similar projects in Australia,
East Africa and the United States. Petronas
led consortium is hoping to set sail its first shipment of LNG by 2019 before a
number of Australia’s brownfield projects start ramping up. Analysts say that some South Korean investors are already
gravitating towards U.S. projects.
Then there is the proposed
long term multi-billion dollar oil and gas agreement between Russia and China which
Russia’s president Putin is going to pursue aggressively. If this agreement
gets concluded, it would mean China’s financial capacity and need to import
these resources from other countries like Canada would get that much reduced.
Which would in turn mean the companies intending to invest in Canada may like
to change their minds.
On the flip side, the Ukraine crisis has got the
Europeans to clearly articulate their desire to source their long term energy
needs from Canada (and US). This is a godsend opportunity for Canada to
latch on to and expedite the necessary approvals process associated with oil
and gas and pipeline projects.
Just to give
an idea on negative impact of ‘endless cycle of consultations’, as oil sands projects
stall and crawl, Canadian producers have lost as much as $30-billion annually
due to discounts on their blend of crude in the past few years. While spreads have narrowed over the past 12 months
there is much more at stake. According to energy consultancy IHS CERA if oil sands production reaches 3.8 million barrels per day
in 2025, the bitumen’s contribution to Canadian GDP could nearly double, and a
third more jobs could be expected.
“Between 2012 and 2025,
oil sands’ contribution to Canadian GDP could grow from $91-billion to
$171-billion,” the IHS estimated in a report published this year. “This would
be like adding an economy the size of Saskatchewan today to Canada by 2025. Oil
sands could also add over one-quarter of a million more jobs, contributing to
753,000 jobs in Canada in 2025.”
To address the concerns
around environmental impacts of oil sands development, Alberta already has in
place stringent measures and more are expected. This should blunt criticisms
brought forth by the environment-activists. As
regards carbon emission issue, an independent group of scientists/experts are
challenging the White House National Climate Assessment (NCA) issued
in early May. In their view, the foundation of the NCA is a "masterpiece of
marketing" that crumbles like a "house of cards" under the
weight of real-world evidence.
And, in regard to the
issue of opposition by the aboriginals to the various oil and gas and pipeline
projects, the legal experts say that as for
aboriginal communities, they need to recognize that their right to be consulted
doesn’t negate the government’s power to make decisions.
Summary:
Energy (oil and gas) is a vital component in the
context of restoration and sustainability of Canada’s economy and standards of
living associated with this first world country. The companies in Canada, who wish to implement the various oil and gas
and pipeline projects, and the Federal and the Provincial governments must
expedite the approvals’ process. The window of opportunity for Canada is NOT going
to be there for ever, therefore, it would be a criminal folly if they fail to
capitalize on the opportunities presented to Canada by the global situations.
No comments:
Post a Comment